MOGADISHU: The Federal Government of Somalia has dismissed media reports suggesting plans to expel the United Arab Emirates (UAE) ambassador, describing the claims as unfounded and deceptive. According to a statement from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation, Somalia expressed concern about baseless allegations circulating in certain media outlets and on social networks.
The ministry affirmed that no decision had been made regarding the diplomatic presence of the United Arab Emirates in Mogadishu. It called on media organizations and citizens to depend on official information sources and act responsibly when sharing content, noting that false information could harm diplomatic ties. The statement comes during a period of increased focus on regional connections, as Somalia continues to develop strategic partnerships across the Gulf while maintaining diplomatic stability.
Background: Strained Somalia-UAE Relations
The denial follows months of heightened tensions between Mogadishu and Abu Dhabi. In January 2026, Somalia’s Council of Ministers announced the termination of all bilateral agreements with the UAE, nullifying defense, security, and port cooperation pacts, citing “strong evidence” of actions detrimental to Somalia’s national unity. The decision came amid public outrage following allegations of an Israeli resettlement plan and Israel’s formal recognition of Somaliland in December 2025, a move Mogadishu views as a direct violation of its sovereignty and territorial integrity.
In February 2026, the UAE suspended security aid to Somalia, following Mogadishu’s formal withdrawal from bilateral agreements. Speaking at the time, Foreign Minister Abdisalam Abdi Ali clarified that the Emirati assistance had been primarily targeted at bolstering Somalia’s military and security institutions. “With the agreements terminated, there is no valid foundation for that assistance to continue,” he explained. Despite the cessation of security support, the Foreign Minister emphasized that diplomatic connections between Mogadishu and Abu Dhabi persisted, with both embassies continuing to function normally.
Diplomatic Engagements and Regional Realignments
The diplomatic rift has been further complicated by the UAE’s engagement with Somaliland. In early May 2026, the UAE welcomed Somaliland President Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi Irro with elevated protocol during a working visit to Dubai, hosting the delegation at a distinguished government guest facility. The reception underscores sustained unofficial interaction between the UAE and Somaliland, despite the territory’s lack of international recognition. The UAE remains a key trade partner and source of investment for Somaliland, particularly through DP World’s $442 million investment in the Port of Berbera.
The federal government has since pivoted toward strengthening ties with other Gulf partners. Somalia has confirmed ongoing discussions regarding a tripartite security arrangement with Saudi Arabia and Egypt, focusing on enhancing collaboration on Red Sea security and broadening military partnerships. Somalia and Saudi Arabia established a landmark cooperation agreement focused on port development and maritime transport, signing a major military and security pact designed to safeguard critical sea lanes and counter regional instability.
Humanitarian Cooperation Continues
Despite the political tensions, humanitarian collaboration between Somalia and the UAE has continued. In February 2025, SoDMA received food aid from UAE Ambassador Ahmed Juma Al-Rumaithi intended to support 600 vulnerable families in Mogadishu. The ambassador also announced a substantial pledge of 7,000 tons of food aid for Somalia, to be distributed during Ramadan. SoDMA and the UAE ambassador have also discussed Sabun Dam repairs and preparations for seasonal flooding. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs reiterated its call for media organizations and citizens to rely on official information sources and act responsibly when sharing content, warning that false information could harm diplomatic ties. The denial of expulsion plans suggests that both sides, despite their differences, are committed to maintaining a functional diplomatic relationship and avoiding a complete rupture.
